Page 20 - Prestige Pulpdent
P. 20

 PHYSICAL
  STRENGTH
Compressive and Diametral Tensile
Strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE- RESTORATIVE is comparable to composites 200 and far superior to glass ionomers 150 and RMGIs.
300
250
100 50
Compressive Strength of Dental
Restorative Materials 50
40 30 20 10
Diametral Tensile Strength of Dental Restorative Materials
Compressive Strength of Base/Liners
                    Filtek = Composite; ACTIVA = Bioactive Restorative; Ketac Nano = RMGI; Fuji IX = Glass Ionomer Source: University testing17 (References: www.pulpdent.com/ education-articles)
00 Flexural Strength of Base/Liners
                             100 90 80 70 60 50 ACTIVA = Bioactive Base/Liner; Fuji Lining = RMGI; 40 Vitrebond = RMGI; TheraCal = Resin-Modified Calcium 30 Silicate 20 Source: University testing18 (References: www.pulpdent.com/ 10 education-articles) 0
300 250 200 150 100
50 0
Compressive and Flexural Strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE-BASE/LINER is much greater than resin-modified base/liners and RMGIs.
                                                                                        Shear bond strength of ACTIVA BioACTIVE- CEMENT compares favorably with leading cements and is superior to RMGI and calcium aluminate-glass ionomer cements tested.
ACTIVA = Bioactive Cement; RelyX = Self-adhesive Cement; FujiCEM 2 = RMGI; Ceramir = Calcium Aluminate-GI
Source: University testing38 (References: www.pulpdent.com/ education-articles)
20 15 10
5 0
Shear Bond Strength of Four Dental Cement
      Zirconia
Lithium Disilicate
                                                                  WEAR
                    20
                                                      Volume wear of ACTIVA BioACTIVE- evaluated for surface wear resistance, abrasive toothpaste and was comparable
RESTORATIVE is comparable to composites ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE performed and far less than glass ionomer. When better than all other materials tested with
to flowable composites with non-abrasive toothpaste.
Volume Wear of Four Restorative Materials
1,2 1 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0
FujiIX=GlassIonomer;ACTIVA=BioactiveRestorative; Tetric = Composite; Filtek Supreme = Composite Source: University testing28 (References: www.pulpdent.com/ education-articles)
Wear of ACTIVA Compared to Glass Ionomers, RMGIs and Flowable Composites
Surface Wear After 10,000 Cycles with Non-Abrasive and Abrasive Toothpastes 3
      2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0
Colgate Non-Abrasive
Arm & Hammer Abrasive
          Tetric EvoFlow
Beautifil Flow Plus
Ketac Nano
Vitrebond Plus
Fuji Triage
                                   ACTIVA = Bioactive Restorative; Tetric EvoFlow and Beautifil Flow Plus = Flowable Composite; Ketac Nano and Vitrebond Plus = RMGI; Fuji Triage = Glass Ionomer Source: University testing27 (References: www.pulpdent.com/education-articles)
PULPDENT Corporation / 800-343-4342 / 617-926-6666 / www.pulpdent.com
Surface Wear (μm)
Volume (mm3)
Compressive Strength (MPa)
Diametral Tensile Strength (MPa) Flexural Strength (MPa) Compressive Strength (MPa)
Diametral Tensile Strength (MPa)
















































   18   19   20   21   22